The opening to Jared Kushner’s new memoir, “Breaking History,” begins with the final stanza from Rudyard Kipling’s poem, “If:” “If you can fill the unforgiving minute / With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run, / Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it, / And — which is more — you’ll be a Man, my son!” Kushner, one can only imagine, intends for the poem to foreshadow a story of stoicism and virtue. Instead, the poem aptly sets the scene for the musings of a sad, Lost Boy, desperate for the approval of a looming father figure.
“My duty to serve the president of the United States came first, even before family,” Kushner reflects several hundred pages later, without a whiff of irony.
The poem aptly sets the scene for the musings of a sad, Lost Boy, desperate for the approval of a looming father figure.
The fealty and revisionism are of little surprise. What is surprising, however, is just how tragic a figure Kushner reveals himself to be. He attempts to position himself as a man of strength and intellectual rigor but his prose comes across as childlike and flat. “Usually I avoid engaging in futile arguments, but this was enough. I could feel my voice rise,” he writes, describing a particularly tense moment with then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. Tillerson bitterly opposed Kushner’s handling of the Middle East and, specifically, his suggestion that the U.S. embassy in Israel be moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — a decision decried by many policy experts as “reckless.” “My words had stung. The former oil titan was growing more frazzled and insecure, so I softened my tone.” So goes the biting account of a big boy who put an oil titan in his place. (Kushner’s ability to make such exchanges appear humdrum is one of the more impressive feats of the book.)
In an administration as damaging as former President Donald Trump’s, uncovering the Machiavellian ideology of key players holds a silver lining: Ideology grounded by clear political goals is more definable and, hopefully, more opposable. Kushner instead appears to be driven by sycophancy and insecurity; and this absence of intellectual cohesion or sophistication from many of Trump’s closest advisers, including Kushner, helped foster Trump’s distinctive flavor of White House chaos.









