In overruling Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court has turned back the clock on women’s rights and, by extension, individual liberties for all of us.
Reproductive privacy is in danger, and our current lack of digital privacy protections makes this problem even worse. A lot of data that companies collect on consumers can be used against people if state governments choose to prosecute individuals seeking or providing abortions.
A loophole allows law enforcement agencies to simply buy data from private data brokers.
Location data can show if a person visited an abortion clinic. Payment data can show if someone paid for a procedure. Messaging data can show if an individual talked to friends about getting an abortion. Even something as innocuous as grocery shopping data can pose a risk. (Companies like Target have found that just analyzing consumer shopping history can help them predict when a shopper is pregnant.)
Now that Roe v. Wade has fallen, states that choose to criminalize abortion can start buying and subpoenaing consumer data (including health and location data from period-tracking apps) to prosecute people who get an abortion, provide an abortion or even aid someone else in obtaining an abortion. In post-Roe America, your cellphone is now a reproductive privacy risk.
Millions of people use health-tracking apps, including those that track periods, fertility and pregnancy. Many people carry mobile devices on their person throughout most of the day, often communicating about topics like reproductive health through messaging apps, social media and more. Our inability to control who gets access to our digital data was already troubling, but now our lack of digital privacy rights might soon lead to terrifying outcomes for people seeking or providing reproductive health care.
Policymakers might not have the power to pass laws to protect abortion rights, but they can still tackle the problem of sensitive health data and who has access to it.
To protect both digital and medical privacy, including as it relates to reproductive health, Congress should move on the American Data Privacy and Protection Act, the bipartisan federal privacy bill introduced in the House in June. Among other things, the act would provide a cohesive national framework for privacy, creating guardrails on the collection and usage of data and holding companies to higher standards of data minimization and data security. While a federal privacy law will not be specific to reproductive rights, many of these privacy principles will serve to better protect consumer data that could otherwise be used for prosecuting those who receive abortions.
Democrats need to do more than recite poems and sing songs for photo ops.
Congress should also consider the Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act, a bipartisan bill introduced by Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Rand Paul, R-Ky., and others in April 2021. This bill would specifically stop data brokers (companies that buy and sell user data from a variety of sources) from selling Americans’ personal information to law enforcement. While the legal process for law enforcement searches and seizures must go through constitutional Fourth Amendment protections, a loophole allows law enforcement agencies to simply buy data from private data brokers. The Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act would stop that.
And tech companies, especially those in health tech, need to build in protections to protect their customers, including supporting encryption, and instituting data minimization principles and legal processes for responding to government requests for data. For people who live in states where even helping someone get an abortion may soon be a crime, the ability to use encrypted messaging will be essential to protecting sensitive conversations.








