We’re three weeks out from the legal test that could make or break Obamacare, and it’s not entirely clear that the Supreme Court can even hear the case.

Just because Chief Justice John Roberts voted to uphold the health care law last time around doesn’t mean he has to come out the same way again.

Obamacare’s challengers are pushing to send the law back to the Supreme Court, while the White House hopes to resolve the case in a lower court.

One key aspect of the decision is unique, and it deserves more attention than it’s gotten.

The Supreme Court decision on recess appointments wasn’t a one-sided loss for the administration; it was in large part a win for presidential power.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday dove into the murky waters of affirmative action, and the result was déjà vu.

In several politically-charged decisions, Chief Justice Roberts has embraced what are arguably contradictions, abandoned precedent without explanation, or both.

After 52 attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, this one might succeed.

An 82-year-old “liberal” judge’s latest decision may trigger Supreme Court review of the single most important legal issue for the gay-rights movement.

On Tuesday, the court will revisit that issue for the first time in a decade.