Despite a jury’s $25 million verdict against a group of white nationalists, neo-Nazis and organizers of the 2017 Charlottesville, Virginia, “Unite the Right” rally, Republican leaders, once again, will not take the opportunity to repudiate the alt-right.
Republican leaders, once again, will not take the opportunity to repudiate the alt-right.
By now, this is an old story with a familiar pattern: denial, silence and historical revisionism.
Four years ago, after former President Donald Trump referred to some of the participants in the deadly rally as “very fine people,” Republicans had a chance to make it clear where they stood.
Torch-carrying bigots chanted, “Jews will not replace us!” An avowed neo-Nazi drove his car into counterprotesters, killing 32-year-old Heather Heyer.
It was an easy call for a normal political party.
Republicans could have issued a historic denunciation of bigotry.
They could have denounced anti-Semitism.
They could have announced that there was no place for white nationalists in the party.
They could have drawn a bright, red line against political violence — and attempts to normalize violence.
Instead, for the most part, Republicans either looked the other way, kept quiet or went along with Trump’s gaslighting denials that he had, in fact, said what he said.
In many ways, the response to Charlottesville was a dress rehearsal for the right’s response to the Jan. 6 insurrection. The same group that adamantly denied that Trump had praised racists as “very fine people” are now pushing revisionist versions of what happened at the Capitol.
In the Charlottesville suit, we heard all the usual rationalizations and defenses: that it was about free speech, the violence was in self-defense and that no one could have known it would have a deadly outcome.
In the end, though, there was no glossing over the ugliness.
During the trial, one of the rally’s participants, Michael Hill, the president of the League of the South, was asked about a pledge he had posted online. He was asked to read it aloud in the courtroom: “I pledge to be a white supremacist, racist, antisemite, homophobe, a xenophobe, an Islamophobe and any other sort of phobe that benefits my people, so help me God,” he read.
Then he added: “I still hold those views.”
The response to Charlottesville was a dress rehearsal for the right’s response to the Jan. 6 insurrection.
For much of the alt-right, the trial became the focal point of their white supremacist race war. “Supporters of the far-right maintained a cheering section online full of expletive-laced rants against Black and Jewish people,” The New York Times reported, “while the defendants themselves weighed in with commentary.”
In the end, the Charlottesville civil suit will probably end up as a historical footnote, but it will nevertheless be a consequential one because it comes at a time of rising menace.
But this time, at least, there will be accountability for the leaders.
The white nationalists’ courtroom defeat came just days after the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse, the teenager who had shot and killed two men and wounded and third in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
White supremacist groups were quick to seize on the verdict as a victory and a call to arms. “White nationalist hate group has found ‘the hero we’ve been waiting for’ in Kyle Rittenhouse,” tweeted Michael Edison Hayden, a reporter for the Southern Poverty Law Center.







