Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration has reached yet another milestone in its quest to subject Florida students to one of the most puritanical educational systems in the nation.
The Florida Department of Education has instructed its superintendents that Advanced Placement Psychology can only be taught in their districts if the course’s content on sexual orientation and gender identity is removed. In response, the College Board, which oversees the creation and administration of AP courses, said that any course taught without those components would violate college requirements, and as a result, “the Florida Department of Education has effectively banned AP Psychology.”
This is unfortunate news for Florida students, more than 28,000 of whom took AP Psychology in the 2022-23 academic year, according to the College Board. Now, just as the school year is about to start, it looks as if many of them will be robbed of the chance to take the course for college credit.
DeSantis’ administration treats students as guinea pigs for a radical experiment in reactionary paternalism.
And it’s yet another example of how DeSantis’ administration treats students as guinea pigs for a radical experiment in reactionary paternalism, narrowing what kinds of ideas students should be exposed to, and weaponizing education as a key tool for advancing a right-wing agenda.
AP Psychology has included content about sexual and gender identity since its inception 30 years ago. And it’s not a peripheral part of the curriculum, as the development committee responsible for guiding the AP Psychology course made clear in a statement:
[G]ender and sexual orientation are essential, longstanding, and foundational topics in the study of psychology. College-level introductory psychology students will encounter gender and sexual orientation as topics of study. Psychology graduates go on to pursue a range of careers and must be able to successfully navigate professional environments that will require familiarity with these concepts. … No experienced educator or practitioner in our field would support the decision to make these topics off limits.
That’s the experts talking, but this is also common sense. How can one teach a course about the the development of the human mind and behavior while ignoring central pillars of human identity?








