UPDATE (Nov. 14, 2023 6:00 p.m. ET): The House passed the GOP’s stopgap funding bill by 336-95 with mostly Democratic votes. The bill now goes to the Senate.
It’s not often that the House of Representatives is united these days. But with a new bill to avoid a federal government shutdown, Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has managed to draw together the chamber’s disparate factions. Unfortunately, the general consensus toward Johnson’s proposed solution is less a “hell yes” and more of an “um, what?”
The Washington Post summed up the overall reaction perfectly: “Instead of appeasing just one ideological faction, the proposal has angered the hard right, puzzled the middle and was mocked by the White House.” And yet, wildly enough, Johnson might manage to avert yet another self-inflicted wound for House Republicans without actively hurting government workers and vulnerable Americans. For now, at least.
After a bruising fight for the speaker’s gavel, Johnson has been riding on his colleagues’ goodwill. A dyed-in-the-wool conservative with little history in leadership, Johnson has had more of a grace period than his predecessor, Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. Accordingly, the short-term funding bill that he introduced Saturday isn’t stacked with potential bribes to the far right like McCarthy’s first attempts to keep the government open in September.
After a bruising fight for the speaker’s gavel, Johnson has been riding on his colleagues’ goodwill.
It does include a “laddered” approach, an idea that originated with a member of the far-right House Freedom Caucus. The bill splits the short-term funding into two tranches, each with a different expiration date. The first would extend the funding covered by four spending bills — Agriculture, Energy and Water, Military Construction-VA and Transportation-HUD — until Jan. 19. The rest of the government, notably the Defense Department, would be funded until two weeks later — Feb. 2.
Conservative supporters think the ladder structure would “keep the heat on the Senate to pass individual appropriations bills while giving hard-line Republicans in the House, who typically balk at stopgap funding measures, incentives to vote for them,” according to NBC News. Personally, I think it’s a ridiculous idea, one that just means more scrambles to avoid a shutdown in the coming months. But here’s a plot twist: Even as Democrats are giving Johnson’s idea some serious thought, some conservatives are balking at the resolution he has put forward.
The rebel GOP contingent — which already includes enough Republicans to potentially tank the bill — is mad that despite the laddering, funding levels are set to remain at their current levels. Johnson’s approach would also separately extend the current version of the farm bill — which sets agricultural policy, as well as authorizing nutrition programs like food stamps — until next September. And while it doesn’t include supplemental funding for Ukraine and Israel, it also doesn’t have House Republicans’ harsh border bill tacked onto it, either.
So instead of the deep cuts conservatives have been clamoring for, what the House is considering is in essence a clean continuing resolution, or CR, but with a weird herky-jerky mechanism built into it. That’s much more in line with what Democrats and swing-district Republicans have supported, hence the general sense of “wait, what?” that the bill has engendered. Accordingly, as of Monday evening, while House Democrats expressed skepticism about the broader concept of a laddered CR, they had yet to come out firmly one way or another on this particular proposal. There’s a sense that this may be the best chance to avoid a shutdown, even if the bifurcated setup serves no purpose except to cut off any chance of a consolidated spending bill like the one that passed last year.








